Thursday, Oct. 15th, 2015
Topic: Should The United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
This report will investigate the rise of drone use by certain countries. This is a controversial topic but we will try to arrive at the root of the issue. These unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), otherwise known as drones are remote controlled aircraft which may be armed with missiles and artillery for attack missions. Do the pros outweigh the cons? What are the long-term consequences?
This argumentative report will prove that the use of drones should not be utilized.
Drone use desensitize us to the reality of hurting civilians. Just in recent news an American armed drone hit a 'Doctors Without Borders' Hospital.
Drone use can potentially cause an even more chaotic situation on the ground where innocent civilians live. Our opponents believe that drones are highly necessary because we cannot dialogue with Extremists. Extremists who are a danger to themselves and others.
However, constant drone bombings, maybe the actual cause for creating these Extremists who despise us. Innocent families, and children may be hurt by these unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
In conclusion, this report has clearly proven that drone use should not be utilized. We have proven this by using these three critical points: i) It desensitizes us to the reality of hurting innocent civilians, ii) Its use could potentially create an even greater chaotic situation in those countries, and iii) Drone use could possibility create an even more violent society by trying to solve our problems using violent methods.
Topic: Should The United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
This report will investigate the rise of drone use by certain countries. This is a controversial topic but we will try to arrive at the root of the issue. These unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), otherwise known as drones are remote controlled aircraft which may be armed with missiles and artillery for attack missions. Do the pros outweigh the cons? What are the long-term consequences?
This argumentative report will prove that the use of drones should not be utilized.
Drone use desensitize us to the reality of hurting civilians. Just in recent news an American armed drone hit a 'Doctors Without Borders' Hospital.
Drone use can potentially cause an even more chaotic situation on the ground where innocent civilians live. Our opponents believe that drones are highly necessary because we cannot dialogue with Extremists. Extremists who are a danger to themselves and others.
However, constant drone bombings, maybe the actual cause for creating these Extremists who despise us. Innocent families, and children may be hurt by these unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
In conclusion, this report has clearly proven that drone use should not be utilized. We have proven this by using these three critical points: i) It desensitizes us to the reality of hurting innocent civilians, ii) Its use could potentially create an even greater chaotic situation in those countries, and iii) Drone use could possibility create an even more violent society by trying to solve our problems using violent methods.
Topic: Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed?
The Death Penalty also known as Capital Punishment has been eliminated in Canada since 1976. However some States in America and around the world still embrace this practice to punish citizens in their nation. This Argumentative Report will prove that the Death Penalty is a barbaric practice and should be eliminated. These violent methods to punish civilians should be seen as out-dated in the 21st Century.
Capital Punishment has no deterrent effect on crime. States in America and countries around the world who uphold the Death Penalty have not seen a decrease in crime, or violent crime in there given jurisdictions. ( Texas, for instance has an ever growing crime rate even though they uphold the belief in Capital Punishment.
The Death Penalty wrongly gives governments the power and control to take human life, and this perpetuates all the social injustices by disproportionately targeting poorer sections of our society and people who cannot afford expensive lawyers to defend them. (Structural Functionalism).
We are a civilized society, and every human life is sacred and precious. Reformation and rehabilitation techniques are improving. Psychologists are now discovering that violent offenders have had negative experiences in their formative childhood years that trigger their criminal behavior as adults. If psychologists can discover the root cause of their deviant behavior we can then rehabilitate and heal the mental illness that exist in our most violent offenders.
In Conclusion, this argumentative report has clearly proven that the Death Penalty should be eliminated from Human Society. We have successfully proven this by using three vital points: i) Capital Punishment has no deterrent effects on crime, ii) Capital Punishment enforces social inequality and persecution, and iii) Capital Punishment is a barbaric practice and does not belong in the 21st Century.
The Death Penalty also known as Capital Punishment has been eliminated in Canada since 1976. However some States in America and around the world still embrace this practice to punish citizens in their nation. This Argumentative Report will prove that the Death Penalty is a barbaric practice and should be eliminated. These violent methods to punish civilians should be seen as out-dated in the 21st Century.
Capital Punishment has no deterrent effect on crime. States in America and countries around the world who uphold the Death Penalty have not seen a decrease in crime, or violent crime in there given jurisdictions. ( Texas, for instance has an ever growing crime rate even though they uphold the belief in Capital Punishment.
The Death Penalty wrongly gives governments the power and control to take human life, and this perpetuates all the social injustices by disproportionately targeting poorer sections of our society and people who cannot afford expensive lawyers to defend them. (Structural Functionalism).
We are a civilized society, and every human life is sacred and precious. Reformation and rehabilitation techniques are improving. Psychologists are now discovering that violent offenders have had negative experiences in their formative childhood years that trigger their criminal behavior as adults. If psychologists can discover the root cause of their deviant behavior we can then rehabilitate and heal the mental illness that exist in our most violent offenders.
In Conclusion, this argumentative report has clearly proven that the Death Penalty should be eliminated from Human Society. We have successfully proven this by using three vital points: i) Capital Punishment has no deterrent effects on crime, ii) Capital Punishment enforces social inequality and persecution, and iii) Capital Punishment is a barbaric practice and does not belong in the 21st Century.
- Topic: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? ( 5 Paragraph Report)
This professional report will outline the argument in a systematic way describing that violence in video games in just one of many factors contributing to our youth becoming more violent in the 21st Century.
Video games are really a new scapegoat that our society has blamed. First it was music (Heavy Metal, Rap) , then cartoons, movies and now video games.
Many other factors are involved in the prevalence of violence in our current society. Specifically, the lack of parenting, uncaring guardians, teachers, and unregulated gun laws that are the true source to this problem.
However, the real questions is whether our society and even our human nature is violent in nature, or peaceful could be the issue we need to deal with. If we are violent naturally then video games could help us carry out these violent acts in the video game world rather than hurting each other in real life. But, if we are peaceful and compassionate by nature then violent video games are keeping us separated from our true nature which is caring, loving, compassionate, and peaceful.
Either way we look at this important issue, our youth and parents have neglected to look carefully at the consequences of video games and violence. It has desensitized to a certain extent. Also, a new area that has been recently developed is that of Mental Health. If a child is un-diagnosed with a Mental Health issue they will most likely more vulnerable and affected by the extreme violence that is inherent in these modern video games and they could be affected in a more permanent way. All youth however, in general may become more cold, who lack emotion, and compassion depending on the amount of exposure and when they started to play these violent video games. This professional report has successfullly proven that this topic is a very complicated one, consisting of many layers of introspection. We have proven that we must protect the most vulnerable of our society and that is something everyone could agree on.We proved this by utilizing these three critical points: i) Video Games are the new scapegoat for trying to describe how our society is becoming more violent. ii) Many factors exist besides looking solely at the Video Gaming Industry, and iii) Our youth who are battling mental health issues, may be more affected by these video games than others, and we need to really research more the consequences and outcomes of prolonged exposure to these video games in our society, and what negative role they may play for our future generations.
- Controversial Topic: Should Marijuana Be a Medical Option?
-
Medical marijuana is a polarizing social issue that has long been debated in our nation. The use of medical marijuana is an unnecessary, unproven approach to dealing with health concerns, which may cause more harm than good.
Medical marijuana may cause side effects to the user and cause more harm than benefit. These are health concerns like memory loss, apathy, and problems with our lungs from smoking for instance.
Self-medication may cause people to become ‘their own Pharmicist’ and not see a doctor, which may lead to complications from health issues not being treated properly.
However, opponents will say that marijuana is a harmless drug that helps people manage medical issues when conventional means fail. New research refutes this claim as it has been documented to be a gateway drug that can lead to harder drug use in the future.
In conclusion, marijuana is not needed due to other legal and safe prescriptions available. It is an unnecessary risk that can lead to harder drug use that can lead to other long-term health problems. This professional report has successfully proven this by utilizing the three critical arguments: i) medical marijuana is unnecessary. ii) many side-effects, and unknown long-term effects, and iii) marijuana is a gateway drug.